🔍 Read the full analysis: What Meta, TikTok And Google See At Stake In Indonesia’s AI Bill on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
TL;DR
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a Nov. 11 parliamentary hearing to challenge provisions in Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision. The draft could require payments for news links and previews and set rules for AI training and AI-assisted works, but it is still under discussion and the current text is not publicly confirmed.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in challenging parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, as lawmakers consider rules that could require digital platforms to pay for displaying news and establish conditions for using copyrighted works to train artificial intelligence. The proposal is still being deliberated, and the current draft has not been made available for independent review.
The bill would revise Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is discussing it with the government. Reuters reported in July, citing a draft that a law ministry official authenticated but said was not final, that the proposal would cover both news-platform payments and AI-related copyright questions.
Under that July version, platforms could owe compensation for aggregating or republishing news, displaying link previews, and using news content for AI training. The payments would be routed through state-supervised collective management organisations. The draft also proposed rules on whether AI may imitate a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, and protection for works made with human assistance. Fully AI-generated works would not qualify for copyright protection under that version, while the amount of human contribution needed was not specified.
At the November hearing, Google opposed payments for news links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licensing for AI training data, according to accounts by Reuters, Suara and Kompas. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing an article and said payment requirements could affect publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said disclosure rules should not cover cases where AI merely assists a creator and also called for platforms to retain safe-harbor protection, according to the supplied reporting.
What platforms see at stake in Indonesia’s AI bill
Meta, TikTok and Google challenged parts of a proposed copyright-law revision. Its reported rules could affect news links, publisher payments and AI training, but the bill remains under discussion.
What the proposal could cover
A July draft described possible rules for news compensation and copyright in AI use.
Payments for links
Platforms could owe compensation for aggregating, republishing or previewing news.
Training and creation
The draft addressed AI training, style imitation, disclosure and human-assisted works.
Where companies objected
| Company | Reported concerns |
|---|---|
| News link payments, one licensing body and mandatory AI-training licenses | |
| Meta | Links are not republication; payment duties could affect publisher traffic and revenue |
| TikTok | Disclosure when AI only assists creators; continued safe-harbor protection |
What remains unresolved
The reported November text was not available for independent review.
- Whether July draft provisions remain in the current version
- How much human input would qualify an AI-assisted work for protection
- How licensing, disclosure and style rules would be defined
- What fees or payment allocations might apply
Next steps to watch
Lawmakers may publish or circulate a revised text.
Baleg and the government continue discussions.
No vote date was reported.
The Stakes for News and AI
The proposal touches two major parts of the online information system: how publishers are paid when platforms surface their work and what rights apply when AI models learn from copyrighted material. If enacted, the rules could affect the availability and presentation of Indonesian news on search and social platforms, as well as the licensing costs and data choices of AI developers.
The disagreement is also about who should set the terms. Platforms favor approaches they say preserve linking, intermediary protections and workable routes for training models. Publishers and their representatives argue that platforms benefit from news content and that existing arrangements have not delivered adequate support. The effects on readers, creators and publishers would depend on the final wording, enforcement and any agreements made under the law.
At the hearing, the Press Council, or Dewan Pers, said platforms account for 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent, according to the supplied account. Those figures were presented by the council; the hearing material provided here does not specify the measurement periods or comparison bases, so they should not be read as independently established measures of the bill’s likely effects.
Popular right now
Roborock Robot Vacuum and Mop with LiDAR Navigation and Self-Empty Dock
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Noise-Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones, Twilight Blue
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From 2014 Copyright Law to AI Rules
The legislation would amend a law passed in 2014, before today’s generative AI systems became a central policy issue. In July, law ministry official Hermansyah Siregar told Reuters that generative AI had disrupted the copyright framework and described the draft as Indonesia’s first explicit recognition of AI in copyright law. He also stressed that the text was not final.
Indonesia already has Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that implementation had been weak and platform compliance low, according to Aktual. The proposed copyright revision would add a different set of mechanisms, including possible compensation obligations and collective licensing.
The bill is a parliamentary initiative rather than an enacted law. Reporting on its provisions has relied in part on a July draft, and accounts of the November hearing refer to a later text that was not available for direct examination. The draft’s content and article numbering may have changed during deliberations.
“A levy on links would leave Google with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
The Current Draft Is Not Public
The full version discussed on Nov. 11 was not available in the source material, and reports describe different versions of the bill. As a result, it is not possible to confirm whether every provision in the July draft remains, how the latest text defines its obligations, or whether the article numbers cited at the hearing are still accurate.
Several policy questions remain unresolved in the reported text: how much human input would be needed for an AI-assisted work to qualify for protection; how any style-imitation restriction would be defined; what disclosure would be required; and how a licensing or fair-use approach would apply to large-scale AI training. The supplied reporting also does not establish the likely fee levels, the exact allocation of payments, or how a platform would be assessed for compliance.
Companies’ warnings about reduced news access, publisher traffic or AI performance are predictions and arguments made by interested parties, not demonstrated effects of a law that has not been passed. No vote date was reported.
Lawmakers Continue Bill Deliberations
Baleg is continuing discussions with the government, following its Nov. 11 hearing with Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia. The next developments to watch are publication or circulation of a revised draft, further hearings, and any announced timetable for a parliamentary vote.
Until lawmakers approve a final text and it takes effect, the reported provisions remain proposals. The details that emerge from the next draft will determine whether the bill keeps payment rules for news links, how it treats AI training and disclosure, and what protections or exceptions apply to platforms, publishers and creators.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the copyright and AI bill?
No. Parliament approved the measure as an initiative on March 12, 2026, and it remains under deliberation by Baleg and the government. No vote date was reported in the source material.
What did Meta, TikTok and Google object to?
They challenged different parts of the proposal. Google opposed payments for news links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory AI-training licenses. Meta said link-sharing is not republication and argued payment duties could affect publisher traffic and revenue. TikTok said disclosure rules should not apply when AI only assists a creator and sought continued safe-harbor protection.
Would the bill make platforms pay publishers for links?
A July draft reported by Reuters proposed compensation for platforms that aggregate, republish or display previews of news, as well as for certain uses in AI training. The current draft was not available for review, so it is not confirmed that those details remain unchanged.
What AI rules were described in the draft?
The July version reportedly addressed AI imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, copyright protection for AI-assisted works and the use of copyrighted material for training through fair use or licensing. The reported text did not specify how much human contribution would be required for protection.
When will lawmakers vote?
No vote date has been announced in the supplied reporting. Baleg is still discussing the bill with the government after hearing from platforms and other groups on Nov. 11.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
